What a week for Wall Street--and it has been only two days. To recap, after the stock market plunged on Friday after the release of a government report on employment growth, which pleased almost no one, stocks fell back sharply again on Monday morning, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average quickly shedding more than 500 points. Once again it was worry over international trade matters, principally with China, concerns about the possibility of a slowing economy stateside, and uncertainty over the direction of the Federal Reserve Board policies in the months to come that held the buyers at bay in the early going.

However, not to be denied, the bulls would not surrender after that initial selloff, and these perennial optimists spent the remainder of the session clawing their way back, so that by the close that 30-stock composite and the S&P 500 Index were both incrementally in the plus column. The tech-laden NASDAQ fared much better, inking a solid win. It was a major early-week statement by the bulls and gave cause for some optimism going forward. Then, yesterday morning, after a mixed session in Asia and early gains in Europe, the U.S. stock market headed sharply higher at the open, with the Dow advancing by more than 350 points very quickly.  

Once again, though, a reversal set in, with that index and the other large and small-cap composites giving up those early gains by the noon hour and then heading lower into the first part of the afternoon. Equities headed lower after some contentious talk broke out between the President and the Democratic leadership in Congress over boarder security. The President threatened to shut down the government if more monies were not allocated towards building the wall along our southern border. This continuing fight offset some earlier optimism that the U.S.-China relations might be improving.

This possible thaw followed a week of mixed messages and uncertain signs between the two economic behemoths. In any event, after that brief buying surge, the Dow would fall into the red by 200 points, before mounting another comeback attempt as we moved inside the trading day's final two hours. Clearly, such back and forth does not help market sentiment. At present, many pundits are either forecasting further lows in the weeks to come or a year-end rally. Whether we get one or the other or something in between will be heavily influenced, we sense, by the outcome of U.S.-China talks.

The recovery would prove to have legs, as the Dow, once off 200 points, would surge anew, climbing to a late-session advance in the 200-point range. Once more, however, political drama in Washington and worries about China proved too much for the bulls to handle, and stocks pulled back as we neared the bell. It would seem as though skittish investors are wary of being long overnight, especially after conflicting statements regarding China were issued. Here, the Administration cited optimism about a possible trade breakthrough countered by a ratcheting up of tensions in regard to other matters with that country. 

So, stocks stumbled into the close, ending matters with little aggregate change on the day. On point, the Dow would close off by 52 points; the S&P 500 would barely move, and the NASDAQ would gain 11 points. The S&P Mid-Cap 400 and the small-cap would each end modestly lower on the day. Given the intra-day fireworks, the final numbers do not even begin to tell the story. What this latest session does do, however, is again shred the confidence of weary investors and suggest that upcoming sessions will again show elevated volatility.

Looking out at a new day now, we see that stocks were strongly higher in Asia, while in Europe so far this morning, the major bourses are showing early gains, as well. Also, oil prices are climbing on news of OPEC supply cuts, while Treasury note yields, up yesterday, are rising once more. Finally, in what is likely to be another volatile day, the U.S. equity futures are posting early solid increases after the President indicated optimism about a possible trade breakthrough with China.

- Harvey S. Katz, CFA 

 At the time of this article’s writing, the author did not have positions in any of the companies mentioned.